Larsen Financial is a full-service investment center that has all the products and services of the major brokerages, but without the high costs.

Learn more.

Obama Killing Jobs, Not Creating Them

  • Obama Killing Jobs, Not Creating Them

  • 30 October 2011 by 0 Comments

Obama Killing Jobs, Not Creating Them

By Richard Larsen

Published – Idaho State Journal, 11/23/11

Our economy continues to struggle, with unemployment staggeringly high, inflation eating away at the purchasing power of our dollar, and the Misery Index (unemployment plus inflation) at a 28 year high. It’s critical that we understand how important job creation is to our economic stability, as well some of the greatest obstacles preventing the kind of job growth that our economy is capable of.

The total U.S. population is about 312 million people, with a labor force of about 154 million. Of those, 139 million have jobs, leaving 15 million unemployed, with current unemployment rate at 9.1% per the Department of Labor September Jobs Report. The Wall Street Journal estimates that the total unemployment figure is closer to 17% when counting those who have simply given up looking for work, which takes the unemployed count closer to 28 million. High unemployment is not only catastrophic for those unable to find work that want to, but for an economy like ours where 70% of the total GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is based on consumption, from gas, food and housing, to services and products.

According to the Labor Department, over 80% of the jobs in the U.S. are in the private sector, with state, local, and federal government employees making up the remaining 20%. And that’s even with public sector employment increasing 7% since 2000, and the private sector losing 1% during the same period. Economists estimate that 150,000 new jobs need to be created every month just to keep pace with our population growth and the number of new entrants into the job market.

Most critical to the employment landscape are small businesses that employee 500 or fewer employees. According to the Small Business Administration, small businesses represent 99% of all employer firms, employ half of all private sector employees, pay 45% of total U.S . private payroll, generate 80% of new jobs annually, create more than 50% of nonfarm private GDP, comprise 97% of all identified exporters, and produce 26% of the known export value to our GDP.

Since employee costs, which include wages, employer-paid taxes on those wages, and employee benefits including health care, are typically the largest expense item of a small business, businesses are reluctant to add new employees until or unless warranted by market conditions.

Government regulation adds significantly to the costs associated with running a business. Earlier this year the Small Business Administration reported that regulation costs American business $1.75 trillion per year, and costs small businesses as much as $10,585 per employee.

Some regulation is needful to protect consumers, the environment, and workers. But much of it adds needlessly to business costs. According to the Federal Register there are more than 4,200 new regulations in the pipeline. Most of these are being implemented by the federal bureaucracy, and not tied to legislation coming out of congress, and that doesn’t include the 2,000 pages of new regulations imposed by Obamacare. Some of the more inane regulations are coming from the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) like regulating farm dust as a pollutant,  imposing illogically demanding requirements on energy producers, and regulating the manufacturing sector like never before with extreme emission demands. Obama did warn that his policies would make “energy prices skyrocket.” That’s one promise he’s keeping, but regrettably, they are destroying jobs and livelihoods as well.

The Hill reports that new regulations imposed by an out-of-control EPA will “cause economic activity in much of the country would grind to a halt. Construction would slow. Energy prices would rise. Businesses would be unable to expand. Large parts of the country would be off-limits to new industry.” These extreme regulations put our energy producers and small businesses, including farms, at risk of going out of business, or raising costs so much that consumer and producer inflation will go out of sight.

The Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI has estimated the cost could be as high as 7.3 million jobs by 2020 and add $1 trillion in new regulatory costs per year between 2020 and 2030 for just one of those new regulations.

Senator John Barasso of Wyoming said recently, “Our economy is continuing to sink and it’s being weighed down by regulations coming out of this administration.”

The President’s proposed jobs bill is simply an attempt to throw more money at the unemployment problem. If he was serious about job creation, he would call off the dogs at the EPA and the rest of the alphabet soup of government agencies and start reducing regulation rather than illogically increasing it. Reduction in regulation would cost less and have far more positive affect in job creation than throwing more of our tax money at the problem.

Jobs by small businesses are the backbone to our economic system, and assuch, are the key to our economic stability and growth. Government encroachment through increased regulation stymies economic and job growth. If the president was truly interested in creating new jobs, he should first stop his bureaucracy from killing them.

AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with a BA in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board.  He can be reached at

About the

More than anything, I want my readers to think. We're told what to think by the education establishment, which is then parroted by politicians from the left, and then reinforced by the mainstream media. Steeped in classical liberalism, my ideological roots are based in the Constitution and our founding documents. Armed with facts, data, and correct principles, today's conservatives can see through the liberal haze and bring clarity to any political discussion.

Related Posts