Falsified Data Used to Promote Treaty
- 29 November 2009 by Author 0 Comments
Falsified Data Used to Promote Treaty
By Richard Larsen
Published – Idaho State Journal, Published 11/29/09
Next month the United Nations is gathering in Denmark to work on the Copenhagen Climate Treaty, ostensibly to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Language within the Treaty itself should alarm any sentient being, especially Americans, as it calls for creation of a transnational government that would supersede our Constitution and subvert our sovereignty. That entity would have the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all nations that sign it.
The most stirring and compelling voice of logic and reason against the Copenhagen Treaty has been that of Lord Chris Monckton, former advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. At an address at Bethel University, Monckton said, “This is the first time I’ve ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a ‘government.’ But it’s the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening…. The sheer ambition of this new world government is enormous right from the start—that’s even before it starts accreting powers to itself in the way that these entities inevitably always do.”
The fraudulent and ignominious premise upon which this threat to American sovereignty is being perpetrated is that of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). In unusual candor, the Club of Rome, a premiere global think tank, has revealed how such a “crisis” as AGW can be used to effect political change. They have said, “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” By claiming AGW as a crisis which is man-made and hence, reversible by changing consumption and energy production, they have concocted a scheme whereby national sovereignty is reduced, and a global governing body can dictate, tax, and meddle in national affairs on a global scale. The climate change mantra is touted as a means by which the global order based on the nation-state ought to be reconstructed based on political reasons, not environmental. The clarion call for “reduced carbon footprint” is merely the means to an end. And the end subverts our Constitution and our national identity.
Regrettably, these global plenipotentiaries have accomplices in the academic and scientific world. Carbon dioxide emissions have increased steadily since 1998, while mean global temperatures have dropped in the same time period, erasing a century of “global warming,” and thereby challenging the premise of the AGW alarmists. Since empirical scientific evidence of a causal relationship between carbon emissions and global warming is lacking, those in the scientific and academic world with similar objectives to the Club of Rome and the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC), have falsified data, manufactured false “hockey-stick charts,” and created computer models projecting cataclysmic consequences for mankind if we don’t collectively revert to stone-age level subsistence.
Evidence of this conspiracy was on full display last week when emails from the Hadley Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, England were hacked and released globally. This is the unit that is responsible for ground temperature readings from which NASA’s satellites are calibrated. The emails prove that the temperature data was manipulated in order to show the results they wanted.They included documents written by Phil Jones, Michael Mann and other leading scientists who edit and control the content of IPCC reports. Even NASA’s James Hansen has been caught manipulating data and calculations used by AGW computer models.
The misconduct exposed by the emails is so blatant that one scientist, Tim Ball, said it marked “the death blow to climate change.” Another, Patrick Michaels, told the New York Times, “This is not a smoking gun; this is a mushroom cloud.” Retired NASA climatologist John Theon said earlier this year, “This whole thing is a fraud. We need to educate the public about what we’re going to get into unless we stop this nonsense.”
While this all reads like a conspiracy theory, the evidence is ample that the conspiracy is real. It is a conspiracy to erode national sovereignty and individual liberty and create and grant omnipotence to global governance. And it’s based on a “cause” perpetuated by fraudulent and falsified data, and the Copenhagen Treaty is the means by which their objectives are to be met. All legislation and treaties based on the pseudo-science of man-made global warming should be discarded in the dust bin of execrable man-made concoctions, along with the fallacious and maleficent global warming theory upon which they are based.
AP award winning columnist Richard Larsen is President of Larsen Financial, a brokerage and financial planning firm in Pocatello, and is a graduate of Idaho State University with a BA in Political Science and History and former member of the Idaho State Journal Editorial Board. He can be reached at email@example.com.